About me

Mitt foto
Stockholm, Sweden
My academic blog with history, primarily military history as the main theme. Please leave a comment that can be relevant and useful for the topic which you find interesting. I am writing in several languages, including English, depending on the theme and the languages of the sources. At the moment I am working as guide at Batteriet Arholma military museum in Stockholm. For further information please contact me on lauvlad89@gmail.com

torsdag 28 augusti 2014

Lite lokalhistoria. En berättelse om hur "Tunnan" störtade i Hässelby året 1953


En gripande berättelse om hur en SAAB 29 B som även kallades för "Tunnan" störtade ned i Hässelby den 1 december 1953. Ur texten framgår bland annat att: 

Den 20-årige jaktpiloten Karl Göte Berglund hade redan efter starten varskott flygflottiljen på Barkarby att han skulle behöva nödlanda. Därför dröjde det inte många minuter förrän F8:s katastrofberedskap var på platsen med ambulans och bärgningsvagnar samt sjuksköterska.

Berglund fördes genast i flottiljambulansen till Karolinska sjukhuset. Han hade en svår chock och omfattande kroppsskador. Skallbenet var intryckt med komplicerade skador. Vänstra överbenet var brutet och bägge armarna krossade på flera ställen. 


Hela texten finns på denna länk.

Lessons from the Great War - Trench warfare developments in Swedish army during the WWI . Part IV - Study commission Munck


Study commission Munck and its relevance for the so-called Proposal for instruction for trench warfare.

During the summer of 1917, a new draft publication for trench warfare was published and provided to the army units. The name of the publication was Förslag till instruktion för strid om befästa ställningar which means Proposal for instruction for trench warfare. The proposal for instruction was mainly based on war experiences from the German army on the Eastern front. The so-called study commission Munck consisting of five officers was on a study tour in Germany during April and May of 1916. The following officers were Major general Munck who at the time was the Inspector for Cavalry, Colonel Bouveng from the infantry, Colonel Hammarskiöld from the artillery, Horse master von der Lancken who also was from the Cavalry Inspection and Captain Ericsson from the Fortification.

According to the study instruction, the main objects for the study commission was to study German army organisation for training of the so-called depot troops, substitution of personnel and horses, training of officer replacements and material issues.[1]



Study commission Munck. From left to right: Ericsson, Bouveng, Munck, Hammarskiöld, Améen , Von der Lancken. 



From reports written by Bouveng and Hammarskiöld
Colonel Bouveng wrote in his report that he requested from German military be provided with regulations for trench combat but that the request was denied since the regulations were considered as classified. Instead he was able to gather information at a training depot near Warsaw through conversation with a German officer who he gave Bouveng a summary of directives that were issued by the depot commander. The gathered information from directives about trench warfare included regulations for an infantry company, its disposal in the trenches, reconnaissance assignments and attack on and defence of a fortified position. According to Bouveng’s report, huge attacks were only possible with enough artillery preparation and by different assignments for the attacking troops which during attack would consist of different groups such as pioneers and hand grenade throwers. Regarding the defence of fortified position, it was to be based around the forward (first) defence line where Bouveng wrote that it was ones holy duty to fight and hold the position.[2] A such statement should be seen as reflection of contemporary German army tactics for trench warfare in which during defence combat it was considered that the first defence line was to be defended at all cost.


Colonel Hammarskiölds wrote in his report that the study commission during its activity had contact with a great number of experts and that it also was at the same time hard to gather real information because of the war where new adoptions took place all the time  and who were interpreted and performed in different ways.[3] In a chapter about artillery tactics he presented the latest combat experiences where he wrote that the infantry attack was not possible without artillery support and that howitzers were to be used for fire support during attack while canons were more suitable for artillery fire during defence.[4] Also, he wrote about that artillery was supposed to be under command of one artillery commander where the artillery was to be organized according to different types of artillery for different firing assignments.[5] Another experience was that direction of artillery fire was to be planned before the attack which was not a method used before the war.[6] On that way, a stronger element of surprise could be achieved.







[1] KrA, generalstaben, utrikesavdelningen, f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie E I g, vol 52 B, 1916-1917. Munck: Svenska Studiekommissionens Rapport öfver ersättningsväsendet i Tyskland 1916.
[2] Ibid, Bouvengs report s.35-43.
[3] Ibid, Hammarskiölds rapport s.1-2. Even Bouveng wrote that different units on different part of the front and with different time since arrival to the front had different combat experiences.
[4] Ibid s.42-44. The German terms used here were stürmfeur (storm-fire) used during the attack while sperrfuer (swipe/locking fire) was used during the defence. 
[5] Ibid s.44-47. Information was taken from a lecture held at the Artillery School in Jüteborg held by a former artillery commander. 
[6] Ibid s.48-49 

söndag 10 augusti 2014

Lessons from the Great War - Trench warfare developments in Swedish army during the WWI . Part III - Study tours during the war




About study tours during the war

The Foreign section of SGS (Utrikesavdelningen) was assigned to gather and analyse information about military developments outside of Sweden. One of the main procedures were study tours usually performed by general staff officers but even by other army personnel such as military doctors. Before WWI, during the period of 1900-1914, around 400 study tours were performed in almost all contemporary European states.[1] According to researcher Christian Sandhal, the main subjects for study tours were studying developments regarding military technology and combat technique. Also, there was a need to follow developments in military organizations of states that compering to Sweden for a long time had been used conscription service which was introduced in Sweden in 1901.

During the period of 1914-1918 around 60 study tours were performed which comparing to period before the war meant an extensive decline of study tours per year. Around one-third of the study tours from period of 1915-1918 were directly or indirectly focused on trench warfare. Of these, around 20 took place on the Eastern front while seven took place on the Western front.[2] Even if the war against Russia ended in autumn of 1917 Central powers remained the main destination for study tours where focus was switched on German army on Western front and Austro-Hungarian army fighting in Italy and in Balkans. Down below results from my research regarding the number of study tours and their destinations during 1914-1918 are presented.  


Study torus during the war 1914-1918
Year
Germany
Austria-Hungaria
France
UK
Others
Total
1914
5
3
3
2
3
16
1915
4
6
3
1
1
15
1916
2
4
1

1
8
1917
3
4



7
1918
8
6


2
16
Total
22
23
7
3
7
62



















References 


[1] Sandahl, Christian, ”Att vidga sin militära blick. Svenska arméofficerares studieresor till Europa 1900-1914” i Militärhistorisk tidskrift 1995 (Stockholm: Probus förlag, 1995).
[2] KrA, Generalstaben, utrikesavdelningen f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie D I, Liggare över reserapporter och hemar­beten 1914-1931, volym 1 samt serie EI g, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,56a, 57 samt KrA, generalfälttygmästaren och chefen (inspektören) för artilleriet/Artilleriinspektionen, chefen för artilleriets expedition f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie E I, vol. 8-11. 

onsdag 6 augusti 2014

Lessons from the Great War - Trench warfare developments in Swedish army during the WWI . Part II - Early developments


New regulation for infantry 

The development of warfare in the period of 1914-1915 led to conclusions that the regulation for infantry from 1904 was needed to be updated. A new rule was published in 1915, and one of its leading developers was Lieutenant general Lars Tingsten who during WWI was chief of Infantry inspection created in 1915 and had a close relation to SGS.[1] The new regulation had more writing about trench warfare by four pages about attack on fortified position, and it had similarities to the draft proposal published in 1914.[2]





Information from Major Nils Adlercreutz – military attaché in Germany during WWI 


Major Nils Adlercreutz was the military attache in Berlin during the war.[3] In order to follow the war, he had access to different types of sources. Except written sources such as newspapers and military manuals he also visited different parts of  Western and Eastern fronts and he also had close contacts and relation to officers in the German General Staff and high command. During the war, he sent around 400 reports to SGS , many of them related to trench warfare, and expect reports he also sent military equipment that later was tested in Swedish army, such as gas mask and steel helmets.





An example of a military attache report, this one informing about nature and creation of fortified potions. 



His first reports to SGS about trench warfare are from beginning of 1915 and about fortified positions from the summer of the same year. One of his early writings was about that filed howitzers in trench warfare were proved more effective than field cannons and that heavy howitzers were used together within the field artillery during attack on fortified positions. [4] Adlercreutz also noted that there was a difference between trenches on the Western and Eastern front. Fortified positions on the Western front were far much more developed than on the Eastern. According to him it was because of the effect of heavy artillery which was stronger and in bigger numbers on the Western front among French and British armies and weaker and in smaller numbers within the Russian army. Also on the Eastern front, it was possible to develop fortified positions from where offensive operations were to be mounted which was often not the case on the Western front.[5]






Officers on study tours
Also during the early period of the war, several officers were sent on study tours. Aspect that they were studying were varying from study to study. Regarding trench warfare aspects such as infantry, artillery and engineer troops in attack and defence and also technical aspects of military equipment and development of tactics were among the study subjects. One example is from Captain Låftman who visited the German army on the western and Eastern front during the end of 1914 and the beginning of 1915. He wrote in his report that attack, in general, was hard to perform since defence was strong in combat in positional war even if the attacker was attacking in dense formations and on the flanks.[6] He also witnessed the developments of the early trenches and fortified positions that were created by German troops.



Photo from Låftmans report showing the early trenches created on the Western front. 





 Photos from two fortification officers that were on a study tour in area of Prezmysl fortress which in the fight between Austro-Hungarian and Russian armies was destroyed by heavy artillery. 


Reports from military attaches and officers from study tours usually after being sent to the Foreign section of SGS (Utrikesavdelningen) circulated within the organization, being read by General Staff officers from different parts of the organization. One of the main procedures to analyse the incoming information were the so-called winter and aspirant essays. It meant that cadets and potential candidates for new General Staff officers were assigned to write essays with a certain topic. During the period of WWI, a great number of essays that were written were about trench warfare in one way or another.





Field exercise of 1915

Every year SGS were organizing filed exercises with troops from two or several army divisions. There was a plan in SGS for the summer of 1914 to organize an exercise under the name Befästningsövning which meant ”Fortification exercise”. The meaning of the exercise was performing attack on and defence of a fortified position. But because of the outbreak of WWI, the exercise was postponed and performed instead during august of 1915.[7] The scenario of the exercise was that an “Eastern  power” had landed from the sea on (fictive) coast near city of Karlsborg and established a  bridgehead, entrenched itself while the troops form the Swedish army was ordered to attack and drive out the enemy before more reinforcements arrived.[8] Exercise was also probably an opportunity to try the draft proposal for attack on fortifications from 1914. There are also signs about that experiences from WWI were taken in consideration since a fortified position consisted of two main trench lines and attack on them were also performed during the night by using searchlights and during daylight by reconnaissance via aeroplane and balloons.

 
 Example of order for attack during the exercise. The word stormställning means the position from where the attacker will perform the final assault by storming the defenders' position. 





[1]  Lars Tingsten, Hågkomster (Stockholm: Bonniers, 1938), s. 329 f
[2] Exercisreglemente för infanteriet (Stockholm: Lantförsvarets kommandoexpedition, 1915), s. 195 – 200.
[3] Adlercreutz was educated in War Academy but was not a General Staff officer.  
[4]  KrA, Generalstaben, utrikesavdelningen f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie E I as, vol 1, 1915. De fortsatta operationerna av tyska armén intill slutet av februari 1915, inkommen till utrikesavdelningen februari 1915.
[5] KrA, Generalstaben, utrikesavdelningen f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie E I as, vol 1, 1915. Fältbefästningar, inkommen till utrikesavdelningen juli 1915. 
[6]  KrA. Generalstaben, utrikesavdelningen f.d. hemliga arkiv, serie E I g, volym 48, 1913-1915. H.R. Låftman: Vistelse vid tyska armén under kriget 1914-1915, s. 29-46
[7] Lantförsvarets kommandoexpedition, serie B I, vol 76, generalorder 26 juni 1915 nr 887. 
[8] KrA, generalstaben, chefsexpeditionen, f.d. hemliga, serie III, vol 96. Einar Bratt ”Befästningsövningen 1915”, s. 3.















































söndag 3 augusti 2014

fredag 1 augusti 2014

Some movies about WWI




BBC documentary showing how the war started, among other things with cavalry charges against infantry, and how the war soon developed into a positional war where even cavalrymen were placed in the trenches. Historians in the documentary are presenting exciting facts about the first trenches, the effect of machine gun and canned food. 










 

Another BBC documentary, this one about the Battle of Somme but with the focus of one vital part of trench warfare - mine warfare. Movie is showing how British military miners were recruited and how their working assignments and places looked like. 








A movie about Stormtroopers called "Stosstrupp". The film was made in 1934 and used as propaganda during the dictatorship of Hitler and Nazi Germany. It was a part of an effort to popularise "heroes" of WWI. Movie shows almost as a training movie how stormtroopers perform their attack actions in trench warfare.